Humanitats

Nova edició del Cicle Literatura europea i patrimoni

Els Estudis d’Arts i Humanitats de la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya organitzen una nova edició del Cicle Literatura europea i patrimoni. Itineraris d’art i literatura medievals.

Les visites, programades amb la col·laboració del Museu d’Arqueologia de Catalunya (MAC), el Museu Episcopal de Vic (MEV) i el Museu Nacional d’Art de Catalunya (MNAC) són totalment gratuïtes i obertes a tothom i tenen l’objectiu d’acostar-nos al nostre patrimoni històric i cultural a partir dels relats de l’Europa medieval.

El Cicle està organitzat per Neus Rotger, professora dels Estudis d’Arts i Humanitats i conduït per Pau Gerez, Doctor en Història Medieval i en Filologia Romànica i col·laborador docent de la UOC.

Es tracta de tres activitats independents que tenen lloc a tres ciutats que destaquen pel seu patrimoni medieval: Girona, Vic i Barcelona.

CALENDARI

Dissabte, 25 de gener:Literatura europea al MEV
Dissabte, 22 de febrer: Literatura romànica al MNAC 
Dissabte, 22 de març: La Girona de Cerverí al MAC

PROGRAMA 

Dissabte, 25 de gener de 2014
Literatura europea al Museu Episcopal de Vic

Horari: de 10:00 a 13:00 h.
Visita limitada a 30 participants

La capital d’Osona disposa, tal vegada, de la millor col·lecció al món de pintura romànica sobre fusta. Un patrimoni que destaca especialment per un tractament museogràfic molt contemporani que acosta l’art medieval a la sensibilitat de l’espectador actual.

La visita consistirà en el comentari de les obres pictòriques (frescos, frontals, bigues…) i escultòriques (majestats, davallaments, arquetes…) bo i relacionant-les amb la literatura produïda en l’època en què van ser creades.

Imatges i context que ens han d’aproximar també als relats, la lírica o l’esperit d’una literatura, la medieval, que també, malgrat la distància dels segles, manté la fascinació per al lector contemporani.

L’activitat és gratuïta i oberta a tothom. Inscripció obligatòria.

Dissabte, 22 de febrer de 2014
Literatura romànica al MNAC

Horari: de 10:00 a 13:00 h.
Visita limitada a 30 participants

En els vint-i-sis conjunts que conté el MNAC hi ha una unitat d’estil i una unitat d’interès que remet a la literatura de l’època d’arreu de l’Europa Occidental. Aquesta unitat es deu al fet que existia una comunicació cultural molt intensa entre els diferents territoris de l’Europa medieval.

Malgrat que la literatura medieval té un alt component laic, cal tenir en compte fortes influències de l’àmbit religiós –exclusiu en els conjunts murals–; per exemple, no podem deixar de pensar en les Maiestas Domini quan es fa referència a Carlemany en la Chanson de Roland.

L’objectiu de la visita és observar punts de connexió entre les arts figuratives i la literatura de l’època romànica. Així, es comentarà la relació dels grans conjunts de pintura mural que conserva el MNAC relacionats amb la literatura de l’època.

L’activitat és gratuïta i oberta a tothom. Inscripció obligatòria.

Dissabte, 22 de març de 2014
La Girona de Cerverí 

Horari: de 10:00 a 13:00 h.
Visita limitada a 30 participants

Aquesta sortida ens portarà al Museu d’Arqueologia de Catalunya, per després visitar els carrerons de la Girona medieval. Hem volgut anomenar-la La Girona de Cerverí de Girona per a recollir precisament aquesta intenció contextualitzadora de les poesies del trobador segarrenc. L’objectiu bàsic és que els participants en l’activitat prenguin consciència de la interrelació que hi ha entre les diverses arts d’una mateixa època i un mateix espai geogràfic: el romànic.

A la seu del MAC a Girona, situada a l’església del monestir de Sant Pere de Galligants, ens aturarem especialment en la lectura dels capitells de les naus i els del seu claustre, fent notar als assistents diverses escenes, com ara la dels joglars que acompanyen a l’abat i que també es poden veure en una representació similar al MNAC, en un dels murals de Sant Joan de Boí. Destacarem també la relació entre l’artista/artesà, la seva pròpia obra i els comitents mitjançant l’anàlisi de la inscripció de la rosassa del MAC.

L’activitat és gratuïta i oberta a tothom. Inscripció obligatòria.

Podeu descarregar el Dossier complet d’aquestes visites en aquest enllaç.

Propera edició del Cicle: 

Dissabte, 26 d’abril de 2014: Literatura europea al MEV 
Dissabte, 24 de maig de 2014: Literatura romànica al MNAC 
Dissabte, 14 de juny de 2014:La Girona de Cerverí al MAC

Amb la col·laboració de: 

56 comments

  1. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  2. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  3. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  4. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  5. If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  6. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  7. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  8. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  9. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  10. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  11. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  12. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  13. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  14. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  15. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  16. If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  17. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  18. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  19. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  20. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  21. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  22. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  23. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  24. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  25. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  26. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  27. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  28. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  29. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  30. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

Leave a Reply

L'adreça electrònica no es publicarà.