Art

Sitges: modernisme i art contemporani

Dins de la quarta edició del cicle Catalunya, laboratori d’Humanitats, dels Estudis d’Arts i Humanitats de la UOC, tindrà lloc el proper dissabte 21 de març, una sortida centrada en la ciutat de Sitges, en la qual es tractaran els àmbits temàtics següents:

  • el modernisme
  • introducció a l’art contemporani

Sitges. Presentació

El programa d’aquesta jornada serà el següent:

– trobada a les 10,30  davant del Cau Ferrat – Palau Maricel (C/ Fonollar s/n)

– de 10,30  a 12: seminari sobre el modernisme

– de 12,30 a 13,15: visita al palau Maricel

– de 13,15 a 14,15: visita al Cau Ferrat

– de 14,30 a 16,30: dinar (restaurant a concretar, preu aproximat: 35 euros)

– de 17 h a 19 h: visita a la fundació Stämpfli i seminari sobre art contemporani

Inscripció obligatòria (abans del 18 de març)

Informacions d’interès

Per qüestions de logística, i atès que el Cau Ferrat, reinaugurat fa poc després d’anys d’estar tancat, és un recinte relativament petit i l’afluència de gent és molt gran, ens veiem obligats a limitar l’assistència a 30 persones.

L’entrada combinada al palau Maricel, Cau Ferrat i Fundació Stämpfli puja 104 € per grups de 15; en el nostre cas seran 208 €, és a dir, uns 7 € per cap.

A Sitges és molt difícil -i més en dissabte- trobar un restaurant  de preu raonable, bona qualitat i que el local tingui un cert interès. S’estan fent gestions i dimarts de la propera setmana podrem tancar el tema del dinar. No confio trobar res per sota dels 35 €.

Bibliografia bàsica: Joan Campàs (1993). L’art modernista. Una visió històrica. Barcelona. Barcanova. Col. Biblioteca Bàsica d’Història de Catalunya. 96 pàgs.

Professor que impartirà els seminaris:
Dr. Joan Campàs Montaner
jcampas@uoc.edu        Aura digital

16 comments

  1. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  2. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  3. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  4. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  5. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  6. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  7. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  8. This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.

  9. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  10. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  11. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  12. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  13. If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  14. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

Leave a Reply

L'adreça electrònica no es publicarà.