Art

Sant Martí del Canigó i Sant Miquel de Cuixà

Dins de la quarta edició del cicle Catalunya, laboratori d’Humanitats, dels Estudis d’Arts i Humanitats de la UOC, tindrà lloc el dissabte 4 de juliol una sortida centrada en les abadies de la Catalunya Nord, en la qual es tractaran els àmbits temàtics següents:

  • els monestirs medievals: espiritualitat o política?
  • la improbable independència de Catalunya: una visió històrica (del 988 al 2015)

sant_marti_del_canigo
Estat de l’abadia de Sant Martí del Canigó el 1902

Sant_Michel_Cuxa
Sant Miquel de Cuixà a inicis del segle XX. Fotografia d’Eugène Trutat (1840-1910)

El programa d’aquesta jornada serà el següent:

– trobada a les 10 h al poblet de Casteil, passat Vernet les Bains, a l’inici del camí que puja cap a Sant Martí del Canigó

– de 10  a 10,45 h: pujada, a peu, cap a sant Martí del Canigó

– de 11 a 12,15 h: visita de l’abadia de sant Martí del Canigó (guia en castellà)

– de 12,15 a 13 h: retorn a Casteil i, amb cotxe, i desplaçament a Vernet les Bains

– de 13 a 14,30 h: dinar al restaurant Princess

– de 14,30 a 15 h: desplaçament cap a sant Miquel de Cuixà

– de 15 a 16,15 h: visita a l’abadia de sant Miquel de Cuixà

– de 16,15 a 16,45 h: desplaçament cap a Vilafranca de Conflent per Codalet

– de 17 a 18 h: visita de les coves Gran Canaletes

– de 18,45 a 20 h: pujada i visita del Fort Libèria

Inscripció obligatòria (places cobertes)

Informacions d’interès

De Barcelona al poblet Casteil hi ha uns 250 km (unes 3 hores llargues). La ruta més ràpida és per l’autopista direcció Perpinyà i, abans d’arribar-hi, agafar la carretera N 116 direcció Prades (o Prada). En cas de dubte en alguna rotonda, seguir direcció Andorra. Anar direcció Vilafranca de Conflent i abans de creuar un pont per entrar a la ciutat, continuar direcció Vernet les Bains (està, però, indicada la direcció cap a l’abadia de sant Martí del Canigó).

Aparcar al petit poblet de Casteil, de cases disperses. Al final de la carretera que haurem seguit i a la sortida del poble, hi ha un pàrquing prop d’un càmping. En el lloc de trobada, a l’inici de la pujada cap el monestir, hi ha un petit bar amb terrassa.

La pujada, a peu, al monestir pot durar entre 35 i 45 minuts, a ritme tranquil. No cal portar calçat de muntanya atès que és una pista asfaltada.

Preus: visita de sant Martí del Canigó: 5,5 € per ser grup (o 4 €per ser estudiants -no sé quina tarifa ens aplicaran) -gratuïta menors de 12 anys. Visita sant Miquel de Cuixà: 4 €. Dinar: 20 €. Coves Gran Canaletes: 10 € (nens 6 €). Fort Libèria: 6 € (3,5 € nens).

El fet de quedar d’hora al matí és per adaptar-nos als horaris francesos i per a aprofitar al màxim el dia, atès que es tracta d’una sortida de molts quilòmetres. Si algú, per no haver de matinar tant, prefereix anar-hi divendres, pot trobar hotel a Vernet les Bains (el lloc on dinem és l’hotel/restaurant Princess); també es pot mirar a Vilafranca de Conflent o a Prades.

Com sempre, els horaris i les diverses visites poden fluctuar en funció del ritme de desplaçament del grup. Per si hi ha alguna incidència durant la sortida podeu trucar al telèfon 647 08 08 45

Professor que impartirà els seminaris:
Dr. Joan Campàs Montaner
jcampas@uoc.edu        Aura digital

mapa_zona

20 comments

  1. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  2. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  3. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  4. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  5. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  6. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.

  7. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  8. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  9. Hands down, Apple’s app store wins by a mile. It’s a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I’m not sure I’d want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.

  10. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  11. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  12. I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)

  13. Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

  14. Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are.

  15. Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It’s very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.

  16. If you’re still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you’ll know which is right for you.

  17. The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

Leave a Reply

L'adreça electrònica no es publicarà.